Lenovo 20HH0014MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HH0014MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HH0014MD
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 221
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 551
59% 470 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Legend(17AA 2251) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.5
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 16.6
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.8.8341
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 106 91 64 74 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,205
Write 1,183
Mixed 963
SusWrite 135
195% 871 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.6
203% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 513
373% 481 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 141%
Great: 159%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
409GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1030 804 804 805 803 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,465
Write 2,095
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 1,023
390% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 88.9
296% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 1,024
767% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 299%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Kingston 9905624-045.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 26.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback