CDM P8Q77-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	CDM P8Q77-M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8Q77-M2
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130415
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '20 at 12:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 191 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 504 53% 426 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 149 Write 192 Mixed 215 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 30.7 101% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 121 105% 156 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 169GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 89 90 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 79.5 Write 85.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 90.4 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-020.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5474-037.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M2 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: CDM P8Q77-M2

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	21x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	11x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $123Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x

RAM
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 6GBKingstonBench 29%, 8 samples	5x
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 37%, 6 samples	4x
99U5474-020.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5474-037.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 41%, 6 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $479

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16