HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 75
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 79.4
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 132
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4432
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.56
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.87
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WR 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 289 287 298 289 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 408
Write 428
Mixed 204
SusWrite 287
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 25.3
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 229
198% 296 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 103%
4GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3 3 3.2 3.8 3.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 3.2
5% 5.33 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 8%
ASMT 2115 180GB
167GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 146 150 146 132 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 172
SusWrite 142
233% 172 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 19.1
1,626% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 23.4
2,203% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 145%
Great: 188%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback