Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 160
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 399
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 85.3
Parallax 80.3
80% 87.8 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 77.3
62% 75.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 206 195 201 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 192
Write 155
Mixed 168
SusWrite 199
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 31.6
98% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 49
40% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
911GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 129 127 127 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 126
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 6 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback