Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N-MX SE Plus  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '17 at 00:30
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9600
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Memory 3.2
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 68.1
16% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 154
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240
Dell(1028 210B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 6
Parallax 12.5
6% 8.68 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 8.77
Splatting 4.83
5% 6.36 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA024HMCD 24GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 228
Write 58.8
Mixed 68.2
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.13
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 2.18
14% 6.19 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 2.32
5% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
60GB free
Firmware: 10.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 56
Mixed 56.2
42% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.44
102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 472
8% 472 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-MX SE Plus Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback