Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 20:15
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,048
99% 819 Pts
64-Core 1,443
89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.8% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 74
64% 81.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79
Splatting 103
81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 512GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 247 127 216 153 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 429
Write 237
Mixed 306
SusWrite 206
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 30.7
129% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 219
163% 213 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 124%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
88GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,671
Write 2,263
Mixed 246
378% 1,727 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 87.6
298% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 575
574% 931 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
189GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1024 493 495 496 496 742 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 485
Mixed 546
SusWrite 624
160% 725 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 78.8
159% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 428
431% 706 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 180%
Great: 311%
WDC WD10 EARX-00PASB0 1TB
352GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 54 55 54 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 53.6
56% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 28%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
654GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 116
135% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
416GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 54 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 78.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 54.1
86% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
168GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 85.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 0.1
77% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 42%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
356GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 172 170 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 171
168% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 28.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback