Gigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 138
61% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 447
43% 355 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 330A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
87% 109 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 100
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 150 97 19 68 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 358
Mixed 322
SusWrite 113
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 37.2
127% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 125
106% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Toshiba THNSNK128GVN8 128GB
7GB free
Firmware: K8TA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 47 57 49 48 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 396
Write 80.7
Mixed 121
SusWrite 51.9
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 32.3
103% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 126
105% 158 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
15GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 122 129 125 129 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 408
Write 139
Mixed 188
SusWrite 124
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 33
124% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 118
102% 153 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 79%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
290GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 121 132 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 172
Write 165
Mixed 29
SusWrite 131
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
162GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 36 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 33
Write 33.8
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 35.8
41% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
70GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 41 44 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 45
Write 44.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 44.3
56% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 36%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
67GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 44 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 84.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 44.4
90% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback