Asus P9X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 617
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2845) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 23% Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 465 313 277 297 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 478
Mixed 436
SusWrite 346
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 47.3
156% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 347
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
89GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 136 191 240 239 239 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 407
Write 248
Mixed 273
SusWrite 214
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 37.5
138% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 248
190% 260 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
5GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.3
Write 99
Mixed 61
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
223GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 124
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 111 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 109
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 17.2
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
245% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 87%
LaCie Rugged Key 64GB
11GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 25
Mixed 25
SusWrite 15.5
31% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
83% 2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback