TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT62VR 6RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16L2  (all builds)
Memory42.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 17:28
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 99.2
48% 75 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 275
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 55%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2063 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 89
Reflection 100
Parallax 95
73% 94.7 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 106
81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 75.5%
 Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 363 417 443 442 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 444
Mixed 397
SusWrite 400
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 41
138% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 132%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
758GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1298 1539 1534 1433 1473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 1,928
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 1,386
387% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.1
217% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 567
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 512
388% 523 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 259%
 Great: 410%
JMicron Tech 1TB
746GB free, PID 0583
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 576 585 576 589 555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 569
Mixed 516
SusWrite 577
750% 539 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 35.1
2,768% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 38.5
3,192% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 337%
 Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 859B BL16G32C16S4B.M16FE1 MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 859B BL16G32C16S4B.M16FE1 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 25.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 71.1%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16L2 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L2

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples197x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples164x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples25x
GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples311x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples84x
GeForce GTX 1070NvidiaBench 80%, 1 sample1x
SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples56x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples37x
RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GBKingstonBench 79%, 7,907 samples26x
RAM
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples86x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples37x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples32x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback