Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 120
53% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 251
30% 232 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 36.5
24% 31.7 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 34.2
26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 91 78 69 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 199
Write 182
Mixed 160
SusWrite 80.2
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 25.3
84% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 60
DQ Mixed 29.8
26% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
0GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.1 11 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.4
2% 2.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
344GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 47 51 54 52 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 79
SusWrite 53
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
495GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 96 98 98 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 157
Write 132
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 93.8
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 96 98 98 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 169
Write 156
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 93.5
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
149GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 95 79 72 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 102
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 84.9
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 109%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
470GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 85 86 86 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 70.4
Write 76
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 84.4
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 70%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
2GB free
Firmware: 1402
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.5
Write 76.7
Mixed 67.9
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 97%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 640GB
72GB free, PID 3101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 9
Mixed 12
SusWrite 10.3
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
133GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 23.1
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 10.3
26% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
2GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 19.9
108% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 58%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
26GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 85 84 84 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 168
Write 175
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 86.4
164% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 100%
ASMT 2105 1TB
7GB free, PID 51d6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 174
Mixed 40.4
158% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
8GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 23.8
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 10.5
27% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
66GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 81 81 80 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 43
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 78.4
74% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback