Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 217 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 570 63% 496 Pts	64-Core 574 36% 574 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 122 Parallax 123 99% 122 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 103 Splatting 87.2 87% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 97%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 353 442 425 427 427 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 236 Write 106 Mixed 338 SusWrite 382 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 31.8 121% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 213 184% 269 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CRC 4x4GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.8% Excellent	MC Read 29 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 31.1 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 20.9 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	765x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	389x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	227x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	150x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	133x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	189x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	183x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	162x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440