Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 07:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 169
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 392
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 9.84
10% 10.3 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 11
8% 9.46 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 78 99 103 104 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 86.3
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 4.4
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 2
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $301
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback