Dell Latitude E5420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E5420  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0H5TG2
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 110
54% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 157
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 049B) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.49 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 314 15 116 6.7 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 436
Write 326
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 127
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
95GB free
Firmware: DEM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 106 105 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 62.5
Write 79.9
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 106
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
345% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5582-008.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5420 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback