MSI MS-17C6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL73 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-17C6  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 218
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 628
70% 549 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 121A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 6.5
5% 12.6 fps
MRender 9.86
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.69 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 87 87 78 42 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 366
Write 230
Mixed 275
SusWrite 100
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.1
36% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 41.2
48% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
778GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 131 132 134 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 35.5
Write 32.7
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 127
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.M16FJ 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 22.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C6 Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback