Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '17 at 20:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 490
66% 490 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 83.1
Parallax 75.2
68% 80.5 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 65.7
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
63GB free
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 483
Write 405
Mixed 407
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 15.8
105% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 111
72% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 106%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 477
Write 369
Mixed 394
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 16.4
106% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 15.4
55% 125 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 180
Mixed 129
113% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 5.44
4K Mixed 0.62
198% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 149
Mixed 144
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 23.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 45.9
87% 45.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback