Asrock H370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 269
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 852
85% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 185
Parallax 226
188% 214 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 148
Splatting 126
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
474GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 101 131 108 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1431
Write 1,485
Mixed 1,056
SusWrite 232
235% 1,051 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.8
231% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 271
340% 594 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 177%
Great: 255%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
80GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 480 475 473 380 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 471
Mixed 382
SusWrite 460
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 50.6
166% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 348
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
WDC WD20EZRZ-00Z5HB0 250GB
52GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 102 100 100 91 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 495
Write 400
Mixed 402
SusWrite 128
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 47.9
160% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 230
205% 309 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
424GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 160
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 154
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 103 99 99 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 92.7
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 97.4
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
613GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41% Average
Read 65.2
Write 74.5
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 77.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.8
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Pro4 - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback