Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,014
97% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 115
Parallax 245
120% 169 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 140
Splatting 160
116% 138 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 115%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,197
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,449
371% 1,641 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 81.7
287% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,019
766% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
284GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1642 917 114 220 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,507
Write 1,645
Mixed 1,324
SusWrite 779
295% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 85.2
309% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 1,299
DQ Mixed 911
694% 909 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 243%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.9
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.3
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback