HP EliteBook 840 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191002
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 09:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 223
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 6.84
5% 6.74 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 5
Splatting 11.4
7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingrich 256G 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 52 99 33 65 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
Read 425
Write 366
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 100
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 1.9
42% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
22% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38%
Great: 80%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31240GNN 240GB
219GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 400 393 408 72 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 376
Write 406
Mixed 372
SusWrite 283
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 30.1
117% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 34
96% 202 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 18.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G2 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback