Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 03:59
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,230
108% 920 Pts
64-Core 2,970
184% 2,970 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 171
Parallax 181
148% 178 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 158
Splatting 115
124% 157 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 1827 1948 1468 1475 1480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,459
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 1,537
460% 2,049 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 90.3
292% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1223
912% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 340%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
79GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 49 49 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 390 392 389 390 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 448
Mixed 436
SusWrite 386
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 51.2
162% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: BXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 301 301 301 301 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 848
Write 307
Mixed 346
SusWrite 301
99% 450 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 40.3
180% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 429
372% 571 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 135%
Great: 144%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
51GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 119 114 119 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 385
Write 123
Mixed 189
SusWrite 121
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 36.8
133% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 111
99% 151 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 165 170 169 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 137
Write 157
Mixed 123
SusWrite 167
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 101%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$176
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 142 141 143 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 141
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 36.3
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 37.8
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback