Lenovo 20156

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20156  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G480
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 03:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B830
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 91.7
41% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 90.6
12% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 93.3
6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 252 151 32 32 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 143
Write 97.9
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 124
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 9
34% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 13.9
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
211GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 60.9
39% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20156 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20156

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $141
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback