Dell Inspiron 580

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Inspiron 580  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0C2KJT
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 99.2
55% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 170
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 14.7
14% 15.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 17.3
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 56 38 36 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 201
Write 193
Mixed 180
SusWrite 59.5
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 31
98% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 48.1
40% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 114 112 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 149
Mixed 80
SusWrite 114
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
729GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 58 38 37 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 60.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 109%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 32
Write 4.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.9
12% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 19%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
828GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 93.8
Write 89
Mixed 30
SusWrite 65.8
90% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CT25664BA1067.M8FM Kingston KTW149-ELD Kingston KTW149-ELD 6GB
1066, 1333, 1066, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 580 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback