Emachines EL1320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines EL1320  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines EMCP61M
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 04:53
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon LE-1660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 33.8
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 37
8-Core 36.9
5% 37 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
XFX(1682 3190) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 5.66
5% 5.95 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 4.04
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HD D HTS545050A 500GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 17 11 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 14.1
6% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5316-011.A01LF0 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.06% Terrible
MC Read 1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 0.4
5% 1.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 0
2% 0.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback