Asus GL703VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL703VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VM
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 14:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 564
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 156E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 46
Reflection 53
Parallax 41.6
38% 46.8 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 65
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 633 630 632 628 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,140
Mixed 557
SusWrite 651
199% 888 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 52.9
196% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 811
578% 754 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 180%
Great: 254%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
663GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 89 93 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 2.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 88.9
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
157% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.D305G.D390B Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VM Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL703VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback