Asus K53U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus K53U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53U
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 13.8
15% 18.7 Pts
4-Core 15.9
8-Core 15.7
2% 15.8 Pts
64-Core 16.4
1% 16.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Asus(1043 104C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.72
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 84 77 81 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 81.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 79.7
49% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.6 3.2 3 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 3.2
8% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.61% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3.6
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.9
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53U Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback