Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,118
102% 853 Pts
64-Core 1,648
102% 1,648 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 227
Reflection 244
Parallax 257
185% 243 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 228
Splatting 144
167% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1627 1521 1491 1515 1566 1491 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 1,183
Mixed 1,339
SusWrite 1,535
354% 1,589 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 71.1
230% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 672
503% 678 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 288%
Great: 431%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 24 24 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 219
Write 19.4
Mixed 73
SusWrite 48
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 20 21 22 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 144
Write 16.9
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 41.9
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST8000NM0055-1RM112 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 224
Write 19.4
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 50.9
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
736% 5.67 MB/s
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2
7% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
82% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2C3000C15 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 19.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback