Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 19:19
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 918
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2335 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 163
Parallax 142
116% 149 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 144
Splatting 122
104% 127 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,176
Write 1,326
Mixed 729
309% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 53.7
244% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 839
676% 951 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
242GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 143 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 100
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 140
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
69GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 131 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 98.8
Write 81.4
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 130
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
103GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63% Good
Read 106
Write 72.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 112
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.3
405% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
213GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 157 157 155 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 78.8
Write 72.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 156
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
228GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 70 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 69.2
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 68.9
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 157 161 161 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 113
Write 145
Mixed 114
SusWrite 156
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
383% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 78%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 1.5TB
13GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 37.9
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB 32GB
3274, 3274, 3274, 3274 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 33.6
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 34.2
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 53
75% 53 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,036
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback