Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 289
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 871
88% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2254 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 160
Parallax 137
115% 146 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 142
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,108
Write 1,132
Mixed 508
272% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 56.4
228% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1125
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 845
707% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
242GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 139 140 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 103
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 139
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB
60GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 123 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 125
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
109GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 140
Write 89.2
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 90
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.4
415% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
217GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 157 156 157 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 67.9
Write 69.5
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 157
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
169GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 69 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 67.8
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 158 164 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 130
Write 153
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 163
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
443% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 1.5TB
25GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 37
Write 34.9
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 37.7
46% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GTZB 32GB
3274, 3274, 3274, 3274 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 33.4
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,036
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback