Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 15:10
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9850
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 74.1
38% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 135
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: 4110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 202 202 201 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.3% Good
Read 239
Write 203
Mixed 147
SusWrite 201
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 35.8
120% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 47.5
43% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 120%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 89 61 88 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 82.8
Write 91
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 81.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 87 86 87 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48% Average
Read 81.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 85.8
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 07A8 500GB
44GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 31.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 34.9
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%
General Flash Disk Drive 4GB
1GB free, PID ffff
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Read 4
Write 0.3
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.5
2% 1.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALiveNF6G-GLAN Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback