Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,135
101% 855 Pts
64-Core 2,188
135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 230
Parallax 257
200% 244 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 219
Splatting 134
166% 213 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 171%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3932 3986 982 970 970 962 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,283
Write 3,561
Mixed 2,381
SusWrite 1967
577% 2,548 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 90.2
309% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 1034
DQ Mixed 1199
886% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 359%
Great: 438%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
663GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 455 458 456 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 453
Mixed 407
SusWrite 456
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 59.2
196% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
56GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 481
Write 133
Mixed 129
SusWrite 129
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 20.5
112% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 45.8
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
52GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 75 75 73 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 435
Write 77.3
Mixed 123
SusWrite 73.5
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 37.7
138% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 95.2
71% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 63.2
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 46
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 137%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback