Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,097
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 2,150
133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909
CLim: 2520 MHz, MLim: 4932 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.6% Above average
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 220
Parallax 273
4% 166 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 212
Splatting 130
160% 207 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3921 3596 3618 1753 953 958 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,042
Write 3,628
Mixed 2256
SusWrite 2,466
590% 2598 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 83
290% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 1,308
947% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 375%
Great: 438%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
663GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 453 453 450 453 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 426
Mixed 387
SusWrite 452
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 56
183% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
56GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 128 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 453
Write 130
Mixed 133
SusWrite 127
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 20.4
106% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 45.8
66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
52GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 70 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 392
Write 73.7
Mixed 121
SusWrite 70.6
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 32.8
123% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.7
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 89.4
66% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 56.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 43.2
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 39.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,025
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback