Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E1400-$14 421 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 45.9 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 29.3 24% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 41.9 8-Core 37.9 5% 39.9 Pts	64-Core 37.5 2% 37.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT 12,718 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 349B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.29% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.58 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.09 2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.29% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.6.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 93 128 132 146 174 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.8% Poor	Read 130 Write 122 Mixed 133 SusWrite 134 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 9 24% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 21.8 DQ Write 49.3 DQ Mixed 27.9 23% 33 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 841GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 94 125 137 150 156 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 157 Write 140 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 130 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HM250HI 250GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 136GB free, PID 0470 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 11 16 18 22 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 21.8 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 18.3 31% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	25x
Pentium E5200Intel $47Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	19x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	15x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	13x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	13x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $127