TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro SYS-1028U-TN10RT+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSupermicro SYS-1028U-TN10RT+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRU-i+
Memory121.5 GB free of 127.996 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '17 at 05:17
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 99.8
48% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 442
39% 330 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 57.7%
 Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPE2MX45 450GB
419GB free
Firmware: MDV1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 598
Mixed 544
122% 545 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 27.2
101% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 126
142% 240 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 141%
Nvme INTEL SSDPE2MX45 450GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MDV1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 620
Mixed 546
126% 561 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 28.2
100% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 123
140% 238 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 4x31.8GB
4 of 24 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback