Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '17 at 00:40
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 98
2-Core 190
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 468
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 56.6
36% 43.7 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 36.7
30% 36.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 87.8
Mixed 91.7
70% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.33
82% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 4.23
Mixed 5.54
10% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.58
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
25% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 7%
Ext Hard Disk 250GB
12GB free, PID 0012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 14.8
29% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.41
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $536
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback