bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 13:42
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 98
2-Core 177
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 469
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 70.1
60% 71.8 fps
MRender 75.6
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 58.9
54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 361 359 357 354 352 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 456
Mixed 410
SusWrite 369
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 43.6
138% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
794GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 196 196 196 195 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 85.3
Write 161
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 195
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
291GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 76.1
Write 49.8
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 75.2
81% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 44%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 9102
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.1 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.54% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 8
Mixed 9
SusWrite 8.1
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
109% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.54%
Great: 9%
PNY USB 3.1 FD 124GB
111GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 18 20 19 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 122
Write 47.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 18
50% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.75 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback