Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 07:49
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 624
68% 536 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 81.4
Parallax 79
64% 79.7 fps
MRender 78.6
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 64.3
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 56RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 127 129 85 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 444
Write 405
Mixed 356
SusWrite 127
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 39.3
149% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 156
149% 235 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
593GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 185 185 184 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 162
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 180
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
313% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 24.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback