Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191204
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '20 at 20:20
Run Duration	339 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 65.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 233 74% 138 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 908 80% 681 Pts	64-Core 1,849 114% 1,849 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 30 Parallax 27 23% 28.4 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 27.1 22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 939 647 654 619 578 520 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 2481 Write 2,284 Mixed 1,625 SusWrite 659 393% 1,762 MB/s	4K Read 58.6 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 75.4 248% 84.1 MB/s	DQ Read 886 DQ Write 588 DQ Mixed 802 581% 759 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 480 481 481 480 482 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 482 Mixed 366 SusWrite 481 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 48.1 162% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 248 206% 294 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 82GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,478 Write 2,319 Mixed 1,592 474% 2,130 MB/s	4K Read 59.4 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 77.3 256% 87.7 MB/s	DQ Read 945 DQ Write 715 DQ Mixed 874 642% 845 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 113GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 469 469 465 465 467 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 477 Mixed 352 SusWrite 466 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 39 139% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 323 229% 290 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB 2,217 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 1TB free Firmware: 42A2S8MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 2190 2186 2191 2202 2188 2181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	351% Outstanding	Read 2,519 Write 2,207 Mixed 279 SusWrite 2,190 402% 1,799 MB/s	4K Read 56.3 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 76.9 255% 89.1 MB/s	DQ Read 914 DQ Write 772 DQ Mixed 662 545% 783 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 351% Great: 382%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 77GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 85 86 85 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 97 Write 78.8 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 84.8 61% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 131 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 146 Write 122 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 131 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 8x8GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 58.2 MC Write 56 MC Mixed 55.4 162% 56.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 24.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 192%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $921

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16