TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B460M Pro4S/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B460M Pro4S/ac  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 17:35
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,030
95% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,615
100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 97.4%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 85.6
83% 92.8 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 82.4
Splatting 77.8
75% 93.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 80.4%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU720 500GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA051R21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 428 423 413 417 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 405
Mixed 356
SusWrite 420
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 51.7
168% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 283
219% 299 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 111%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
860GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 40.7
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 41.5
9% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 12.6
43% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 27.5
21% 28 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 18.8%
 Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 189 186 188 188 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 159
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 188
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4RL.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 88.1%
 Great: 134%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B460M Pro4S/ac Builds (Compare 1,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B460M Pro4S/ac

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel  $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples675x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples390x
Core i5-10600KFIntel  $118Bench 92%, 24,257 samples133x
GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples358x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia  $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples238x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples186x
SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples305x
SU720 500GBAdataBench 81%, 3,550 samples128x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples92x
RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples190x
BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 83%, 4,507 samples80x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 4,421 samples61x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback