MSI MS-1782

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GT72
MotherboardMSI MS-1782  (all builds)
Memory40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 189
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 485
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 53.7
45% 58 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 61
49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 1057 965 980 986 1006 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,009
Write 1,615
Mixed 1,212
SusWrite 1027
276% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 38.2
124% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 403
331% 494 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 166%
Great: 286%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
379GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 369 395 406 419 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 412
Write 342
Mixed 349
SusWrite 385
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 33.2
119% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 281
210% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
564GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 128 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 128
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%
ASMT 2105 3TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 169 169 171 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 161
Write 140
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 169
183% 138 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
88% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GRS 029E CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 029E CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1782 Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1782

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback