Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 91
2-Core 199
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 328
49% 355 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 54.2
36% 46.6 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 38.7
38% 47.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 377 419 392 391 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 416
Mixed 381
SusWrite 366
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 44.8
143% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 144
170% 296 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
21GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 149 155 154 143 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 377
Write 154
Mixed 207
SusWrite 141
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 29.4
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 127
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 87 86 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 89.3
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 86.3
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 75%
Corsair Padlock v2 32GB
12GB free, PID 1ab5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 5.3 5.6 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.3
7% 5.18 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback