Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 21 '15 at 16:03
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 135
45% 100 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 242
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 60%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8
Parallax 7.09
6% 7.5 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.83
5% 6.39 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce 6200
XFX(1682 208F) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 600GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
Read 329
Write 230
Mixed 226
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.01
10% 4.92 MB/s
DQ Read 4.45
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 1.97
4% 6.88 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 100
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.25
97% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
282GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27
Mixed 27.6
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.45
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback