Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 11:53
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 444
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 2.91
4% 5.11 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 438 429 422 402 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 425
Mixed 386
SusWrite 406
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 33.5
114% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 307
246% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 103 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 91.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 102
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 54%
Generic Flash Disk 128GB
19GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 12.8
Write 11
Mixed 12
SusWrite 11.7
16% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
77% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 8%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
12GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 6.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 14.7
24% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
252% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 111%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
119GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 288
Write 40.7
Mixed 50
SusWrite 44.1
102% 106 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 9
850% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 11
986% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB M471B1G73DB0-YK0 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB M471B1G73DB0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback