Acer Aspire V5-552P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory3.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 05:40
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 53.4
38% 52.9 Pts
4-Core 85.3
8-Core 86.8
12% 86.1 Pts
64-Core 88.6
6% 88.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 5.56
5% 6.25 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900812
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 102 31 54 36 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 387
Write 257
Mixed 266
SusWrite 54.3
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 21.7
86% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 22.3
27% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 91%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ee, PNY USB 2.0 FD P-FD32GODM-GE
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 4.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 3.3
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 3.4
10% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552P Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback