Acer Aspire V5-552P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 01:46
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5757M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 53.5
40% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 111
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Acer(1025 080E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 5.59
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 7.52
5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900812
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 46 35 35 24 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.4% Poor
Read 69.3
Write 149
Mixed 21
SusWrite 38.3
16% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 14.5
39% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 67.6
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 21
26% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552P Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback