Asus G70AB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus G70AB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G70AB
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 09:01
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 204
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 568
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 71.6
61% 75.4 fps
MRender 78.9
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 63.1
57% 70.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37256GD 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 303 256 5.6 99 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 448
Write 411
Mixed 230
SusWrite 176
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 23
101% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 70
83% 142 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
447GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 135 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 135
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 109%
WD 325AS External 500GB
276GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 40
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 42.1
48% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
WD 325AS External 500GB
6GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 40 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 37.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40.6
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 17%
WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
143GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.4
Mixed 24
SusWrite 28.4
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1605 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G70AB Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus G70AB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $586
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback