Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '17 at 10:07
Run Duration	367 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 147 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 371 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.90 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.34 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 7.09 5% 5.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4290 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1812 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 51 (AE) Unknown 100 100 142 (B5) Unknown 100 100 7069542122722 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 83 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	49.4% Average	Read 268 Write 181 Mixed 205 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 7.09 83% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 6.31 30% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 99GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93904794 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6918 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 110251320 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6975 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2957 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 344 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 488046621 (C2) HDA temperature 29 44 64424509469 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 25 93904794 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 28608777172633 (F1) Unknown 100 253 955756214 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3202582792	62.3% Good	Read 112 Write 105 Mixed 80.2 74% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.44 91% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 68%
WD 3200AAJ External 320GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 131GB free, PID 0910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28.3 Mixed 29.4 38% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 22%
Kobo eReader 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 4163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.73% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 4.26 Mixed 7.01 8% 7.17 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.09 4K Mixed 0.07 6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	143x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	95x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	68x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16