Asus GL502VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus GL502VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VMK
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190503
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 199
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 114
38% 239 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1800) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 18.5
8% 13.3 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 24.3
15% 17.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 308 339 306 320 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 373
Write 352
Mixed 340
SusWrite 320
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 20.3
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 276
220% 309 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 123%
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310
460GB free
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 278 278 279 277 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 387
Write 353
Mixed 278
SusWrite 283
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 13.5
50% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 220
188% 276 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 106%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.2 5.3 5.7 5.4 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.3
10% 9.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 20
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VMK Builds (Compare 747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus GL502VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback