Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 15:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 859
88% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 54.5
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 51.1
44% 56.1 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 71.1
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 368 367 367 367 368 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 364
Mixed 320
SusWrite 368
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 45.6
170% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 225
181% 253 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
73GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 445 447 446 448 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 441
Mixed 318
SusWrite 445
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 40.8
147% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 120
112% 173 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
794GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 454 455 457 456 457 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 448
Mixed 438
SusWrite 453
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 42.9
151% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 86.4
Mixed 62
SusWrite 110
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 31.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback