bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime39.5 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 82.9
42% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 123
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 75GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 139 133 111 119 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 137
Write 130
Mixed 123
SusWrite 138
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 10.4
41% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 169
129% 174 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 84%
Vmware Virtual disk 5.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 48 48 54 55 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 93
Write 96.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 48.6
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 91%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
196GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 45 48 41 39 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 130
Write 114
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 48.1
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 92%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
240GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 61 61 61 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 119
Write 53.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback