MSI MS-16U7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL65 Leopard 10SDR
MotherboardMSI MS-16U7  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 15:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 264
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 860
84% 686 Pts
64-Core 1103
68% 1103 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12B8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 8.16
5% 34.6 fps
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 15.6
11% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ5 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 245 233 232 227 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 689
Write 704
Mixed 672
SusWrite 275
131% 585 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 41.5
141% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 576
468% 662 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Adata SU630 480GB
288GB free
Firmware: R1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 6.5 66 6.6 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 498
Write 412
Mixed 374
SusWrite 67.4
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 24.8
103% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 42.7
78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 21.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16U7 Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16U7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback