Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	12.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 278 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 795 81% 657 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 131 Parallax 147 108% 137 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 126 Splatting 104 110% 140 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB 9,539 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0725B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 150 119 150 117 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,416 Write 398 Mixed 811 SusWrite 179 154% 701 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 28.2 185% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 681 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 428 388% 589 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 228%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 466GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 153 151 149 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 173 Mixed 102 SusWrite 151 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 23.2 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 22.7 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $32Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	12x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16